Editorial: Typing Is Dead. Your Voice Is Becoming the New Interface of Work
For years, the quiet status game in professional life was about who wrote the sharpest email, the tightest deck, and the most polished memo. But a new divide is opening up inside companies between people who still believe “real workˮ happens at the keyboard and people who are increasingly running their day by dictating ideas into their phone, asking AI to summarize notes, and navigating systems without touching a laptop. That split between Talkers and Typers is starting to reshape what competence looks like at work.
Each era has mistaken its medium for the message. The printing press made reading and writing the master skills. The office era turned typing into a proxy for productivity. Email taught us to equate formality with professionalism. Now the medium is shifting again. Voice is becoming the front door to CRMs, analytics dashboards, project tools, and hiring systems. Younger employees are already solving complex problems by speaking naturally to AI systems while seasoned leaders stare at a blank prompt box, trying to compose the perfect sentence. Typing forces you into linear, edited thought; speaking pushes you to think in real time.
That shift turns your voice into an asset rather than an afterthought. In a voice-first environment, tone, pacing, and the ability to distill complexity into something other people can act on become part of your brand. AI can clean up grammar, reorder ideas, and package your thoughts into neat bullet points, but it canʼt supply the conviction, judgment, or perspective behind them. When meetings are transcribed and summarized automatically, the leader who speaks in coherent, structured ideas will generate crisp summaries and usable training data. The one who rambles or dodges clarity will see their own confusion reflected in every transcript.
Thereʼs a cost to this evolution, too. If everyone defaults to speaking and no one slows down to write, teams risk losing the discipline that comes from revision. Writing forces you to confront your own fuzzy thinking and sharpen it on the page. Voice rewards spontaneity and flow. Businesses that lean too hard into voice without building systems for synthesis end up with hours of recordings and pages of transcripts, but very little organized insight. The raw material for institutional memory is there, but the craftsmanship is missing.
For business owners and operators, the assignment is twofold. First, treat your voice like a skill to be trained. Practice explaining complex ideas in a couple of minutes, listen back to yourself, notice where you lose people, and tighten your language. Second, design workflows that preserve both voice and text. Speak first if thatʼs natural, but always convert key conversations into clear, searchable summaries that your team can reuse. Bridge the gap between Talkers and Typers by letting conversational fluency and writing discipline inform each other, instead of living in separate camps.
Typing isnʼt disappearing, but itʼs no longer the main gate between your thinking and the world. As AI turns conversation into the new command line of work, your real advantage wonʼt be how fast you can hit the keys. It will be how clearly you can think out loud. Your voice is no longer just how you communicate. Itʼs your cognition, made audible, and in the next decade, it may be one of the most valuable assets your business has.
Case Study: How One Founder Turned LinkedIn From a Chore Into a Growth Channel
For years, Jacqueline Ann DeStefano-Tangorra treated LinkedIn as an afterthought. She focused on building her business quietly and assumed no one really wanted to hear her take. Then she noticed something unsettling: the people talking about their ideas in public were creating opportunities she was still grinding to earn behind the scenes. Their voice was scaling their credibility faster than their output.
So she ran an experiment: show up consistently and write the way real people think, not the way experts sound. Within a year, her posts reached 735,296 people and grew her following by 64 percent year over year. Nearly 65 percent of that reach came from just five posts.
Hereʼs the playbook behind that shift:
Translate, donʼt teach.
Most experts post to teach. She posts to translate what people are already feeling but arenʼt saying out loud, like fear of being left behind by technology, burnout from hustle culture, and anxiety about constant reinvention. The goal isnʼt to sound smart; itʼs to sound human and useful.
Lead with honesty, then flip to optimism.
Her best-performing posts named a shared anxiety first, then reframed it as a source of strength or opportunity. That blend of realism and optimism made people feel seen instead of lectured, and turned readers into followers.
Let consistency do the compounding.
September 2025 alone drove about a third of her annual reach, the payoff from six months of consistent, insight-driven posting rather than one-off spikes. She found that posting regularly, even at a modest cadence, beat any single “viralˮ moment.
Stay early on real trends, but explain them simply.
She wrote about emerging technologies, including AI, in plain language that made professionals feel informed rather than behind. Foresight built her credibility; clarity made her ideas spread.
Treat trust as the real algorithm.
Audiences can tell when content is written to perform versus written to connect. She focuses on clarity, empathy, and foresight, trusting that when those are in place, the metrics take care of themselves.
What unites these moves isnʼt hacks or posting schedules. Itʼs the idea of using LinkedIn to interpret change for your audience, not to showcase your expertise to them. In a world where every founder now runs two companies, the one that builds products and the one that builds perception, her story is a reminder that the latter doesnʼt require theatrics. It requires being early, being clear, and being relentlessly consistent.
Play of the Week: Donʼt Punish AI Reluctance
A new Kelly Services survey shows just how wide the AI gap is inside companies: 59% of executives say theyʼd replace workers who “resist adoptingˮ AI tools, and 79% think pushing back on AI is a bigger threat to someoneʼs job than the tech itself. At the same time, fewer than half of workers actually feel AI saves them time, and many say theyʼre not seeing the promised benefits. That creates a leadership and trust problem.
Treat resistance as data, not defiance: If frontline teams are dragging their
feet, assume theyʼre seeing friction, bad outputs, or real risk youʼre not seeing. Start by asking, “Whatʼs not working?ˮ
Make AI training a core skill: Link promotions, bonuses, and career
development to AI fluency in a positive way, like “this is how you grow here,ˮ not “do this or youʼre out.ˮ.
Demo how AI helps them, not just you: Run hands-on sessions that show concrete wins like less admin, fewer repetitive tasks, faster reporting, so people can see AI as an ally for their workload.
Set clear guardrails and expectations: Spell out which tasks must use AI (and why), which are optional, and which stay human-only (e.g., sensitive client decisions, complex judgment calls). Ambiguity breeds anxiety.
Invest in better tools and better rollouts: If people say, “This slows me down,ˮ your job is to investigate. You may have chosen the wrong tools, the wrong workflows, or skipped the change-management piece entirely
Talk openly about job fears: Acknowledge that AI-related layoffs are already happening in some industries. Share your actual plan (or constraints) around staffing so people arenʼt filling the silence with worst-case scenarios.
Measure outcomes: Track whether AI is actually saving time, improving
quality, or reducing errors. If the metrics donʼt move, fix the rollout or admit that particular use case isnʼt ready yet.
The real competitive edge wonʼt come from executives threatening to fire “AI laggards.ˮ It will come from leaders who can translate AI from a vague threat into a set of clear, useful tools and bring their teams along with enough clarity and safety that people are willing to learn, experiment, and tell the truth about whatʼs actually working.
Metric Benchmark
Closing Note
Your advantage lives in how you communicate, not in the tools themselves. A clearer voice makes meetings useful instead of noisy, turns LinkedIn from a chore into a compounding asset, and makes AI feel like support instead of a threat.
The owners who will pull ahead arenʼt the ones shouting the loudest about new tech; theyʼre the ones who translate change for their teams, build trust around experiments, and keep turning messy conversations into repeatable systems.
See you next week.
Sponsor Spotlight: Newsletter
Spacebar Studios are offering to set up a brand-new newsletter for free for subscribers of this newsletter.
If you run a company doing $1M–$50M in revenue and want a growth channel that compounds every time you hit “send,” I’d book a call by clicking on the image below ASAP while slots are still open.
📣 Forward or Reply
If you liked this edition of Growth Curve, forward it to a founder who needs to stop renting audience — and start owning it.