Editorial: RCS Introduces Structure and Trust into Messaging

Text messaging has historically functioned as a simple delivery channel. A message is sent, received, and evaluated quickly, often within a few seconds. That model is becoming less reliable as users question the legitimacy of incoming messages. Scam messages and spoofed sender identities have made users more cautious. As a result, the first decision is no longer whether the message is relevant, but whether it is trustworthy.

RCS addresses this by introducing verification and structure directly into the message. Messages can display a verified business identity, including the brand name and logo, which reduces ambiguity about the sender. In addition, the message format changes. Instead of plain text, RCS supports richer layouts such as images, carousels, buttons, and quick reply options. This allows the message to present information in a more organized and interpretable way.

This structural change affects how users interact with messages. SMS requires the user to interpret the message and decide what to do next, often by clicking a link and moving to another environment. RCS reduces this gap by embedding actions directly in the message. A user can browse products, confirm availability, or move toward a purchase without leaving the messaging interface. This reduces friction at the point of decision and shortens the path from intent to action.

The impact becomes clearer in high-intent scenarios. Messages such as back-in-stock alerts, product drops, and abandoned cart reminders depend on timing. In these cases, small delays or uncertainty can reduce conversion rates. When the message clearly shows the product, confirms its legitimacy, and provides a direct call to action, the likelihood of engagement increases. 

RCS also introduces better feedback mechanisms for marketers. Traditional SMS provides limited visibility beyond delivery. RCS supports additional engagement signals such as reads, clicks, and interactions with specific elements like buttons. This allows teams to measure how users respond to different formats, creatives, and timing. Over time, this data can be used to refine messaging strategies with more precision.

From an operational perspective, RCS is designed to work within, and campaigns, segmentation logic, and automation flows do not need to be rebuilt. The same workflows can be used, with RCS acting as an upgraded delivery layer when supported. When it is not available, messages fall back to SMS or MMS. This ensures continuity while allowing teams to gradually adopt richer formats.

This approach reduces the cost of adoption. Teams do not need to manage separate programs or create entirely new strategies. Instead, they can start with a small number of use cases, measure performance differences, and expand gradually. This makes it easier to test whether the additional structure and interactivity lead to measurable improvements in engagement and revenue.

Messaging is moving toward a model where delivery alone is insufficient. Users expect messages to establish trust, present information clearly, and make the next step obvious. RCS aligns with this expectation by combining identity, structure, and interaction within a single channel. As messaging volumes continue to increase, these factors are likely to play a larger role in determining which messages are acted on and which are ignored.

Sponsor Spotlight: Newsletter

Spacebar Studios will handle your newsletter setup for free — from ICP refinement to template design and sample drafts. After month one, we officially hit the ground running.

Case Study: Consolidating Email and SMS to Unlock Incremental Revenue

Gymwrap, a fitness accessories brand founded by Nicole Ari Parker, was entering its most critical revenue period with a fragmented marketing setup. Email campaigns and SMS were managed on separate platforms. This created siloed customer data, making it difficult to understand channel preferences or coordinate messaging effectively. With a lean team managing over 139,000 subscribers, the lack of a unified view limited both campaign performance and strategic decision-making.

Without integrated data, the team could not determine whether non-responsive email users might convert via SMS or how channels influenced one another. This created uncertainty, with concerns that SMS might cannibalize email rather than add new revenue. At the same time, managing campaigns across platforms increased complexity and slowed execution during a time-sensitive sales window.

The solution focused on consolidation and visibility. Gymwrap moved both email and SMS onto a single platform, integrating the system with Shopify to create a single source of truth for customer behavior. This allowed the team to track engagement across channels and build automated flows, such as abandoned-cart, welcome, and re-engagement sequences, based on real-time data. Instead of treating email and SMS as separate channels, they were orchestrated together, enabling the team to meet customers on their preferred medium.

This shift fundamentally changed how campaigns were executed. Automation replaced manual coordination, allowing marketing flows to run continuously without direct intervention. The unified dataset also enabled more precise targeting, ensuring that customers received messages through the channels where they were most responsive, rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all approach.

The business impact was significant. SMS campaigns delivered nearly 5x higher revenue per message compared to the previous provider, and the first SMS launch generated a 142x ROI. Overall, Mailchimp contributed to 30% of total attributed revenue, demonstrating that SMS added incremental value rather than splitting existing demand. Operationally, the consolidation removed redundant costs and reduced the need for additional hiring, as automation and platform support absorbed much of the workload.

The key takeaway is that channel performance improves when data and execution are unified. Email and SMS are not competing levers but complementary ones. When both are managed within a single system, teams gain the visibility needed to drive incrementality, automate execution, and scale revenue without increasing operational complexity.

Play of the Week: Using Segmentation to Improve Engagement and Conversion

Most brands collect large amounts of customer data but use it only in limited ways. Messages are often sent to broad audiences with minimal differentiation, which reduces relevance. When customers receive content that does not align with their intent, engagement drops, and conversion rates become inconsistent. Segmentation addresses this by aligning messaging with how customers actually behave.

Segment based on behavior, not just attributes
Basic segmentation often relies on demographics or static fields. While useful, these do not capture intent. Behavioral signals such as browsing activity, purchase history, and engagement patterns provide a clearer view of what customers are likely to do next. This allows messaging to reflect current interest rather than past assumptions.

Create segments that map to specific actions
Segments are most effective when they are tied to a clear objective. For example, identifying users who viewed a product but did not purchase, or customers who have not engaged in the last 30 days. Each segment should correspond to a defined action, making it easier to design campaigns that move users forward.

Keep segments dynamic and continuously updated
Customer behavior changes quickly. Static segments become outdated and lose effectiveness over time. Dynamic segmentation ensures that users move in and out of groups based on real-time activity, keeping messaging aligned with current behavior.

Use segmentation to prioritize high-value audiences
Not all customers contribute equally to revenue. Segmentation helps identify high-value users, repeat buyers, and those with strong engagement signals. Prioritizing these groups allows teams to allocate resources more effectively and maximize return from each campaign.

Align segmentation with channel strategy
Different segments respond differently across channels. Some users engage more with email, while others prefer SMS or push notifications. Segmenting messages to preferred channels improves delivery efficiency and increases the likelihood of a response.

Segmentation changes how campaigns are designed and executed. Instead of broadcasting messages to a broad audience, teams should use a structured approach in which each group receives communication that reflects its behavior and intent. This leads to higher engagement, better conversion rates, and more efficient use of data.

Metric Benchmark

Closing Note

Messaging, data, and execution are converging into a single system. When identity, data, and delivery are aligned, performance becomes more predictable. When they are fragmented, teams rely on volume and guesswork. Most gains come from reducing friction, improving clarity, and coordinating channels rather than adding new tools or campaigns.

The advantage will go to teams that treat messaging, targeting, and automation as one integrated workflow. That is where incremental revenue is created and sustained over time.

See you next week.

📣 Forward or Reply

If you liked this edition of Growth Curve, forward it to a founder who needs to stop renting audience — and start owning it.